NASA Invites Media to Djibouti Artemis Accords Signing Ceremony

Meta Title: Djibouti Set to Join Artemis Accords as 72nd Signatory
Meta Description: Djibouti is scheduled to sign the Artemis Accords at NASA Headquarters on September 14, 2026, becoming the 72nd nation to endorse principles for peaceful space exploration.
URL Slug: djibouti-artemis-accords-72nd-signatory
Excerpt: The Republic of Djibouti is expected to become the 72nd Artemis Accords signatory during a NASA-hosted ceremony in Washington. The agreement does not commit nations to lunar missions, but it establishes shared principles for peaceful, transparent, and sustainable space activity.

## Djibouti Is Scheduled to Sign the Artemis Accords

The Republic of Djibouti is scheduled to sign the Artemis Accords during a ceremony at NASA Headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Monday, September 14, 2026.

According to NASA, the signing is planned for 11 a.m. EDT and will be hosted by NASA Deputy Administrator Matt Anderson. Mohamed Siad Douale, Djibouti’s ambassador to the United States, is expected to represent the country. U.S. State Department representatives also are expected to take part.

If completed as announced, Djibouti will become the 72nd country to sign the Artemis Accords, a growing international framework centered on peaceful, transparent, and cooperative exploration of the Moon, Mars, and other destinations in space.

The announcement is a media invitation for a planned ceremony. It confirms NASA’s expectation that Djibouti will sign but does not provide details about specific Djiboutian space missions, funding commitments, scientific instruments, or future participation in Artemis lunar flights.

## What Are the Artemis Accords?

The Artemis Accords are a set of nonbinding principles intended to guide civil space exploration. They were established in 2020 by the United States, working with an initial group of international partners.

The accords are closely associated with NASA’s Artemis program, which aims to return astronauts to the Moon and develop a longer-term human and robotic presence there. But signing the accords is not the same as joining a NASA mission, contributing hardware, or sending astronauts to the lunar surface.

Instead, the agreements set out shared expectations for how nations should conduct civil activities beyond Earth. They draw on established international space law, especially the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, while addressing practical issues expected to become more important as more countries and companies operate near the Moon.

Core principles in the Artemis Accords include:

– Peaceful purposes in space exploration
– Transparency in national policies and plans
– Interoperable systems and shared technical standards
– Emergency assistance for personnel in distress
– Registration of space objects
– Public release of scientific data where appropriate
– Preservation of historically significant space sites
– Responsible management of space resources
– Deconfliction of activities to reduce harmful interference

The accords are political commitments rather than a treaty. They do not create a new international legal regime, nor do they replace the obligations countries already have under existing space law.

## Why Djibouti’s Signing Matters

Djibouti’s planned signature is significant primarily as part of the broader geographic and diplomatic expansion of the Artemis Accords.

Located in the Horn of Africa, Djibouti occupies a strategically important position near the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. Its inclusion adds another African nation to the list of countries publicly supporting a cooperative approach to civil space exploration.

The immediate significance is diplomatic, not operational. NASA’s announcement does not say that Djibouti will contribute a spacecraft, launch system, lunar lander, science payload, ground station, or astronaut crew to Artemis activities. It also does not outline a separate bilateral space agreement.

However, accession can provide a foundation for future discussions involving science education, Earth observation, satellite applications, communications, remote sensing, and space-policy development. Many countries see participation in international space frameworks as a way to strengthen national technical capacity and connect their institutions with global research networks.

For emerging and developing space nations, the value of such agreements can extend beyond lunar exploration. Satellite data, for example, can support weather monitoring, agriculture, water-resource management, disaster response, navigation, and environmental research. The Artemis Accords themselves are aimed at deep-space activity, but the partnerships surrounding them can encourage wider civil-space cooperation.

## A Rapidly Expanding International Framework

The planned addition of Djibouti as the 72nd signatory would underline how quickly the Artemis Accords have expanded since their 2020 launch.

The original signatories included the United States and seven partner nations: Australia, Canada, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom. Since then, countries from Europe, Asia, the Americas, Africa, and Oceania have joined.

That growth should not be interpreted as a single unified lunar program. Artemis Accords signatories have widely different space capabilities. Some operate advanced launch vehicles, robotic spacecraft, scientific satellites, and astronaut programs. Others are building new space agencies, satellite capabilities, or science-education initiatives.

What they share is an endorsement of the accords’ stated approach to responsible exploration.

The framework has also become part of a larger policy conversation about how activities on and around the Moon should be coordinated. As more landers, orbiters, communications systems, and potentially resource-use projects are planned, countries will need ways to avoid interference and communicate clearly about their operations.

## The Importance of Transparency and Deconfliction

Two Artemis Accords concepts are especially relevant to the future of lunar exploration: transparency and deconfliction.

Transparency means participating countries are encouraged to publicly describe their policies and exploration plans. In practical terms, openness can help other operators understand where spacecraft are going, what facilities may be deployed, and how activities could affect nearby missions.

Deconfliction refers to preventing harmful interference between operations. The Moon is vast, but some locations are likely to attract intense interest. These include regions near the lunar south pole, where permanently shadowed areas may contain water ice and where sunlight conditions can be useful for power generation.

The accords call for coordination when planned activities could interfere with others. This does not mean that a country can claim ownership of lunar territory. Under the Outer Space Treaty, no nation may appropriate the Moon or other celestial bodies through sovereignty claims.

Rather, the objective is to encourage communication and safety around specific operations, equipment, landing areas, and scientific sites.

This distinction matters as governments and commercial companies move from occasional lunar missions toward more regular operations.

## Artemis, Lunar Exploration, and International Competition

The Artemis Accords exist in a period of renewed interest in the Moon. NASA and its partners are developing missions intended to support future human exploration, while several other nations are pursuing their own lunar programs.

International cooperation and geopolitical competition are both shaping this environment. Countries may collaborate on scientific data, standards, emergency planning, and spacecraft systems while also pursuing independent national goals.

The accords represent one model for organizing cooperation among willing participants. Other countries may choose different arrangements, and not every major spacefaring nation has signed.

For that reason, the agreement’s expanding membership is notable, but it should not be overstated. Signing does not automatically resolve difficult questions involving resource use, traffic coordination, environmental protection, liability, or the long-term governance of lunar activity. Those issues will continue to be debated through diplomatic channels, national laws, multilateral forums, and future agreements.

## What Happens Next?

If the September 14 ceremony proceeds as announced, Djibouti will formally become the 72nd signatory to the Artemis Accords.

The next steps for Djibouti are not specified in NASA’s media advisory. A signature alone does not establish a calendar of missions or commitments. Any future technical, scientific, educational, or policy cooperation would require separate planning and agreements.

Still, the planned signing adds to the accords’ international reach and reinforces the idea that the future of lunar exploration will involve more than a small group of established space powers.

As countries prepare for increasingly complex activity around the